Laurelhurst lion, back to the home page

Save Strong K-8s

Successful neighborhood K-8s are worth more than just their price per student.

What does research say about K-8 schools?

Large peer-reviewed studies in New York City, Florida, and British Columbia find that students who move to a separate middle school lose ground in reading and math, and the losses last for years. The research also finds that the K-8s that work best are established, stable ones, like Laurelhurst or Sunnyside.

Four key studies

Harvard University

Florida’s public school students in grades 3–10, across nine school years

Guido Schwerdt and Martin West, “The Impact of Alternative Grade Configurations on Student Outcomes through Middle and High School,” Journal of Public Economics, 2013

  • Students who moved to a middle school in 6th grade dropped in math and reading compared with similar students who stayed in a K-8. Moving in 7th grade hurt even more.
  • The losses lasted through 10th grade, with little recovery. The later move into high school caused only a small dip that students recovered from.
  • Absences rose after the move to middle school, and kept rising for the next two years.
  • Lower-achieving, Black, and Hispanic students lost the most in math. Students who were already behind lost more than twice as much as their classmates (127% more), and losses were larger in cities.
  • Florida’s middle schools spent less per student and had bigger grade cohorts, but neither explained the losses. The authors suggest adolescents simply do better with younger students around.
Read the paper (Harvard DASH) ↗
Columbia Business School

New York City students who moved to middle school vs. those who stayed K-8

Jonah Rockoff and Benjamin Lockwood, “Stuck in the Middle: Impacts of Grade Configuration in Public Schools,” Journal of Public Economics, 2010

  • Moving to a middle school in 6th or 7th grade caused a significant drop in both math and English in the year of the move.
  • The losses lasted through 8th grade, the last year the study followed.
  • Attendance fell sharply after the move.
  • Students who started out lower-achieving lost the most.
  • Spending, class sizes, and course offerings were similar in middle schools and K-8s, and larger grade cohorts explained only about a quarter of the drop. The authors found little evidence that separate middle schools are cost-effective.
Read the abstract ↗
University of Toronto

British Columbia students in middle schools and junior highs vs. K-8s

Elizabeth Dhuey, “Middle School or Junior High? How Grade-Level Configurations Affect Academic Achievement,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 2013

  • Students who attended a middle school or junior high made smaller gains in math and reading between 4th and 7th grade than students in K-8 schools.
  • The math losses held up under a second, stricter statistical test designed to rule out differences between the families who choose each kind of school.
  • The effects reached into high school, with large negative effects on 10th and 12th grade English exams.
Read the paper ↗
New York University

New York City 8th graders, by the path of schools they attended

Amy Ellen Schwartz, Leanna Stiefel, Ross Rubenstein, and Jeffrey Zabel, “The Path Not Taken: How Does School Organization Affect 8th Grade Achievement?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2011

  • By 8th grade, students who stayed in one K-8 school outperformed students who moved to a middle school in 6th grade.
  • The path PPS proposes for Laurelhurst, K-5 and then a 6–8 middle school, was the lowest-performing of the paths compared.
  • The likely reasons: fewer school changes, smaller groups of students in each grade, and classmates who stay together.
Read the summary (NYU) ↗

PPS plans to move students at seven K-8s into middle schools in 6th grade. These studies find this transition does lasting harm, especially to the students who are already struggling.

More research pointing the same way

What the research doesn’t say

Why this fits Laurelhurst

Sources

  1. Schwerdt, G., and M. West (2013). The impact of alternative grade configurations on student outcomes through middle and high school. Journal of Public Economics (Harvard DASH).
  2. Rockoff, J., and B. Lockwood (2010). Stuck in the middle: Impacts of grade configuration in public schools. Journal of Public Economics 94(11–12): 1051–1061.
  3. Dhuey, E. (2013). Middle school or junior high? How grade-level configurations affect academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Economics 46(2): 469–496.
  4. Schwartz, A. E., L. Stiefel, R. Rubenstein, and J. Zabel (2011). The path not taken: How does school organization affect 8th grade achievement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33(3): 293–317.
  5. Bedard, K., and C. Do (2005). Are middle schools more effective? Journal of Human Resources.
  6. Malone, M., D. Cornell, and K. Shukla (2017). Association of grade configuration with school climate for 7th and 8th grade students. School Psychology Quarterly.
  7. Byrnes, V., and A. Ruby (2007). Comparing achievement between K–8 and middle schools. American Journal of Education.
  8. Weiss, C., and L. Kipnes (2006). Reexamining middle school effects: A comparison of middle grades students in middle schools and K–8 schools. American Journal of Education 112(2): 239–272.

Another Laurelhurst parent found the Harvard and Columbia studies (Schwerdt and West; Rockoff and Lockwood). I read both and checked the findings against the published papers.

← All issues